Leaders and organizations encounter challenges in today’s fast-changing world. The need for new leadership skills to adapt to volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous environments is urgent. Developing leadership capabilities for a broad range of employees is crucial, but traditional education pathways may not meet current demands. New methods for delivering education, such as the Personal Learning Cloud (PLC), provide customizable and effective options. However, there is a call for more emphasis on social, embodied, holistic, scaffolded, and dynamic learning experiences to prepare leaders for the complexities of today’s world.
Author Archives: François Knuchel
Embracing Complexity in Organisations
In today’s increasingly complex world, traditional leadership models struggle to address the challenges brought forth by VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, Ambiguity). The current hierarchical management methods are counter-productive, exacerbating the challenges of VUCA. To thrive in this environment, organizations and individuals must develop VUCA skills, embrace rich interconnectivity, and cultivate adaptive leadership.
Organisational Culture – Embodied Learning in a New Simulation
Participants of an online people simulation exploring organizational culture found the experience fun, challenging, and eye-opening. By immersing themselves in different organizational cultures, they gained valuable insights into collaboration, team building, and the impact of cultural norms and behaviors on individuals. The simulation provides a unique, embodied learning experience, making it a powerful tool for navigating organizational change and fostering deep conversations and new possibilities.
Why do Organisations need more trained Facilitators?
The lack of cohesion in organizations can be addressed by incorporating Open Space Technology (OST) and training facilitators in this approach. OST fosters cross-departmental collaboration, promotes innovation, and enhances stakeholder dialogues. However, challenges such as the absence of clear agendas and the need for skilled facilitators hinder its widespread use in organizations. By embracing OST, companies can transition to a more adaptive and responsive organizational model.
Community or Organisational Learning Lab Centres
In the 21st century, individuals and organizations require new skills to navigate unpredictability and complexity. Traditional education falls short, leading to the need for “Social Learning” and self-organized “Learning Labs” where diverse participants collaborate to practice essential new skills. This approach fosters a learning organization culture and encourages peer-to-peer cross-functional co-learning.
Distributed Leadership anchored in the Power to Object
The blog post discusses the Japanese lean manufacturing practice known as ‘Andon’, where each employee is empowered to stop the production line if they encounter a quality or safety issue. The post likens this practice to ‘Sociocracy’, an organizational structure that enables all members to have equivalence in decision-making, promoting collective wisdom to refine decisions and overcome objections. The author argues that replacing opposition-based democracy with consent-based sociocracy can enable more efficient and inclusive decision-making in organizations.
Lean, Agile, Teal …. how does sociocracy fit in?
The sociocratic approach emphasizes human-centeredness and forming communities where everyone’s voice is respected. While technically about governance, decision-making, and distributed leadership, sociocracy mirrors the focus on human development central to other methodologies like Lean and Agile. However, the digital future presents a mechanistic approach – contrasting with the organic, emergent thinking of sociocracy. Despite this, sociocracy contributes to a vision of workplaces as collaborative environments of self-development, learning, and joy. Therefore, diversity of methods should coexist, providing balanced ingredients toward creating human-first workplaces.
Is Hierarchy Toxic?
The discussion on hierarchy in organizations is contentious, with some emphasizing its necessity for order while others decry its negative impact. Despite its potential for toxic power dynamics, hierarchy itself is not inherently harmful. A reimagined approach, exemplified by grassroots neighborhood parliaments, highlights hierarchy’s potential as a bridging tool for empowered decision-making and community service.
GoFish! Collective 